$intertrochanteric fracture repair$ $intertrochanteric fracture repair$

The authors of this article found a retrospective study, looking back at patients who have already been treated, which examined mortality rates in patients treated for this type of hip fracture who were treated with surgery or non-surgically. The researchers in this study had what they called “excellent” results from surgery, but the important thing to note is that the nursing care must be of a very high standard in order to prevent problems, such as pressure sores in the skin, blood clots in the legs, and other problems that can arise when a person is bed ridden for long periods of time. As well, those who had traction had a higher rate of losing independence after six months than did those who had surgery.Īnother study of 150 patients also compared traction with surgery, but this surgery involved removing bone. Although the complication rate was low in both groups and there wasn’t much of a difference in the levels of pain or discomfort, the patients who had surgery were out of the hospital faster than those who had traction. At the end of the study, the researchers recommended that surgery be performed, if at all possible.

$intertrochanteric fracture repair$

The authors found a study of 106 patients, by Hornby and colleagues, that looked at patients who underwent traction and compared them with patients who had surgery to have a screw implanted into the hip to repair the fracture. Since surgery is the preferred way to manage a broken hip, non-surgical treatments are usually only done if a patient is not a good candidate for surgery, usually because of health problems. Hip fractures can be treated with either surgical or non-surgical (conservative) treatments.

$intertrochanteric fracture repair$

The authors of this study examined the medical literature to find the best studies that examined this issue and gathered them together into this review. However, despite this division of stable versus unstable, there is no clear cut agreement among surgeons as to how best treat this type of fracture. If a fracture is comminuted, or the bone has shattered or broken into tiny pieces, this is an unstable fracture. When orthopedic surgeons discuss intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures are classified as stable or unstable. Other issues that may cause problems include previous hip injuries, osteoarthritis, the type of break, and other medical problems the patient may have. Bones must be strong enough to withstand the hardware used to stabilize the bone or for the insertion of the prosthesis, as well as being able to hold in place when the patient begins to walk again. One of the problems that surgeons often come across, however, is the weakness of the bones surrounding the fracture. The usual approach to repairing an intertrochanteric fracture is by stabilizing the hip or by putting in a replacement, a prosthesis. These are easier to repair in most cases, as well. This area is rich in blood supply, so keeping the bones healthy isn’t usually something that doctors need to worry about. If someone breaks the hip further up, there can be problems with blood supply to the bones and leg, while this isn’t the case with an intertrochanteric fracture. An intertrochanteric fracture of the hip is the less severe of the hip fractures. A once independent person can end up with a series of medical issues following a broken hip. Hip fractures can be devastating for seniors.

$intertrochanteric fracture repair$

Intertrochanteric fracture repair